Legal Opinion

United States v. Terrell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2010No. 09-3074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Carl G. Terrell challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) on the basis that his sentence was improperly enhanced as a result of double-counting. Specifically, he argues that Amendment 599 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”) prohibits a sentence enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(l) based on the number of weapons involved in the underlying offense when the defendant has also been convicted and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We have jurisdiction under 28…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony GoinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Steven Bruce SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. RojasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Jesus PinedaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Guy Manning, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Loya-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API