United States v. Terrell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Carl G. Terrell challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) on the basis that his sentence was improperly enhanced as a result of double-counting. Specifically, he argues that Amendment 599 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”) prohibits a sentence enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(l) based on the number of weapons involved in the underlying offense when the defendant has also been convicted and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We have jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Anthony GoinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Steven Bruce SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. RojasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Jesus PinedaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Guy Manning, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Loya-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012