Legal Opinion

United States v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2008No. 08-2111PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Theomas Rhodes was originally sentenced in 1997 for his role in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Following the Sentencing Commission’s 2007 amendment of the crack cocaine-related Sentencing Guidelines, Rhodes sought and was granted a modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2). Rhodes now appeals his modified sentence, claiming the district court erred in concluding that it lacked the authority to impose a sentence below the amended guideline range. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Aaron HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. DoublinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. WinderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API