Legal Opinion
United States v. Pearson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2000No. 99-5143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Kevin Lamont Pearson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and carrying or using a firearm in commission of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We exercise our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Keyvee JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bobby PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Corey Allen Wilson, A/K/A JugsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ray Beshera FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Jaime GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MieraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RojasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.