Legal Opinion
Barilla v. Ervin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1989No. 87-4298PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Four Oregon voters brought this action challenging Oregon’s 20-day registration cutoff on the grounds that it unconstitutionally burdens the right to vote and the right to travel. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed to this court, and the defendants, citing intervening events, have sought to dismiss the appeal as moot. We affirm the district court’s judgment as to plaintiffs Barilla, Fore, and Knight, and defendants Ervin, Davidson, and Roberts. As to plaintiff Glancy and defendant Spriggs, we vacate the district…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Native Village of Noatak v. Edgar Blatchford, as Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs, State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- David B. Lowry v. Jo Anne Barnhart, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Dan Hyatt Riley Atkins Bennett EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Florida Association Of Rehabilitation Facilities, Inc. v. State Of Florida Department Of Health And Rehabilitative ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.