Graham v. Manche
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Judge.
James Graham (Graham) instituted this action for civil conspiracy and tortious interference with a contract and reasonable expectancy on 29 November 1995 against defendants Robert Manche, Betty Manche, Goldie Manche and Charles Hinz (collectively Defendants) for impeding an alleged Graham-Loehr contract. Graham’s prayer for recovery seeks compensation for actual damages in excess of $15,000, punitive damages against each defendant for five million dollars, his costs, and other relief which the court deems proper. He does not seek recovery against Louise Francisa Loehr’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Gast v. EbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- DeWitt v. DuceSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Umsted v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Jackson v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Wilson v. FritschyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brown v. KirkhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.