Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Fritschy

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2002No. 21,926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Chief Judge.

{1} On interlocutory appeal, we decide an issue previously left unsettled by this Court: whether we will recognize the tort of intentional interference with expected inheritance when probate proceedings are available to address the just distribution of disputed assets and can otherwise provide adequate relief. See Doughty v. Morris, 117 N.M. 284, 287, 871 P.2d 380, 383 (Ct.App.1994). We hold that the tort will not lie under those circumstances. The district court having denied Defendants’ motion for summary judgment raising this same issue, we now reverse and remand…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rienhardt v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Nicolae Dragan v. John and Sylvia MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Sanchez v. ClaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Umsted v. UmstedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Martinez v. SegoviaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Berol Dewdney and Cordelia Dewdney v. Ralph E. Duncan, IVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  5. Briggs v. Briggs (In re Certification of Court)South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API