Greely v. Noble
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
Plaintiff appeals upon the judgment-roll alone in an action to foreclose an original contractor’s lien for street improvements, claimed by plaintiff under the provisions of section 1191 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff alleged, and the court found, that the work upon which the lien was based was fully completed and performed on June 4, 1917; and that plaintiff’s claim of lien was filed in the office of the county recorder on August 6, 1917, more than sixty days after the completion of the work. From these facts the court reached the conclusion of lawr that the claim of lien was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Boscus v. WaldmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Meyer v. City Street Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perazzi v. Doe Estate Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919