Shufelt v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Osceola. - (Judkins, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1DissentMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries occasioned by a collision of the defendant’s passenger train with the plaintiff’s team, which at the time was being driven by plaintiff’s wife. The declaration avers that the train was running at an unusual rate of speed; that the defendant had caused wood to be piled near the track in such manner as to ■obscure the view of the train as it was approaching the crossing; and that the engineer of the train, upon approaching the crossing, failed to give the statutory signals by ringing the bell and blowing the whistle. At the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.