Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s claim that he was denied his right to be present at sidebar conferences during voir dire of the jury is without merit because "a defendant’s right to be present at sidebar discussions, whether the subject is specific or general bias, is prospective only from the date of the decision in People v Antommarchi (80 NY2d 247), October 27, 1992” (People v Lawrence, 209 AD2d 165, 166, lv denied 84 NY2d 1034; see also, People v Camacho, 209 AD2d 166, lv denied 84 NY2d 1029). The voir dire in the instant case took place prior to that date.

Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor committed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. CamachoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API