Legal Opinion

People v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was denied a fair trial as the result of violations of the People’s disclosure obligations under CPL 240.45 and Brady v Maryland (373 US 83). Even if the failure to disclose the record of the disorderly conduct conviction of a prosecution witness constituted a violation of CPL 240.45 (1) (b), defendant was not thereby denied a fair trial because he “was ‘given a meaningful opportunity to use the allegedly exculpatory material to cross-examine the witness’ ” (People v Osborne, 91 NY2d 827, 828, quoting People v…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CortijoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. PepeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. YelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API