Legal Opinion
Davis/HRGM Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 15, 2001No. 01-414 CPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
I. Introduction
This is a post-award bid protest in which Davis/HRGM (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), seeks to enjoin the United States Army Corps of Engineers (hereinafter “Defendant”) from proceeding with a contract for the modernization of the Myrtilla Miner Elementary School in the District of Columbia. Plaintiff protests the decision to award the contract to the Intervener, Hess Construction, because the contracting officer: (1) failed to comply with regulation and solicitation criteria by awarding the contract to someone other than a responsible offeror who submitted the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- A & D Fire Protection, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Gonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- OTI America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- ABF Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Tigerswan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.