Legal Opinion

United States v. Orozco

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 9, 1997No. 97-2013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Miguel Orozco, Jr., appeals his sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court sentenced Orozco to the statutory mandatory minimum term of incarceration. At sentencing, the district court overruled Orozco’s argument that the court had the authority to apply the “safety-valve” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and impose a sentence below the mandatory minimum because the district court had granted a downward departure in his criminal history category that placed him in Category I. We hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Edgardo RestoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael VALENCIA-ANDRADE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Charles PompeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert BrehmCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. BranchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. CoverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Justin WebbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Julian GarconCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API