Baird v. Baird
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
dissenting.
At about the time that this action was commenced plaintiff likewise filed an action for divorce. Both actions were tried together. The court found for plaintiff in both actions. There has been no appeal from the decree granting plaintiff a divorce.
We do not have before us in this action the complaint in the divorce action. We are not advised as to what the allegations of that complaint were. Presumably it was based upon cruelty.
Plaintiff testified: “Q. Now Mrs. Baird, you have alleged certain acts of cruelty by the defendant in your complaint, would you tell…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Meldrum v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Shaw v. ShawMontana Supreme Court · 1949
- McLaughlin v. CorcoranMontana Supreme Court · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.