Legal Opinion

City of Shelbyville v. Kilpatrick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliusoN

City of Shelbyville acquired a lot in a residential subdivision thereof known as Clearview Heights Addition. Of proper public record is the plat, etc. of this sub-division. Thereon appears this provision:— “All lots in said addition are restricted to residential purposes only”. The City acquired this lot for the erection of a city water tower. Such erection would be contrary to the terms of this restriction. Being doubtful as to its right to construct this tower without liability to pay compensation to the other lot owners in the sub-division, it filed this declaratory judgment bill for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Peters v. BucknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Anderson v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Electro-Nucleonics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. FrankelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Gremillion v. Rapides Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. School Dist. 3, Chas. Co. v. Ctry. Club of Chas.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. McNeillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API