Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Sexauer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.

Beverly Fisher, individually and as executrix of the estate of Sidney Fisher (“Fisher”), appeals the trial court’s award of summary judgment in favor of defendants J.A. Sexauer, Kentile, and Pécora Corporation. The trial court concluded that Fisher, whose action sought to recover for the death of her husband from asbestos-related illness, failed to adduce sufficient evidence to raise a question of material fact concerning causation. Fisher contends that the trial court erred in its assessment of the record and failed to grant her the benefit of all reasonable inferences.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Tragarz v. Keene Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Constantine, K. v. Lenox Instr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. Com. v. Hynson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Harkins, D. v. Three Monkeys CroydenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Mohar, L. v. Shawver, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Nelson, D. v. Airco Welders SupplySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API