Legal Opinion
Ward v. Kennard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 24, 2001No. CIV.A.00-0419(RMU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
Arriving at the courthouse steps on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judg ment, this dispute involves the plaintiffs allegations that the defendant violated his due process and equal rights, discriminated against him on the basis of his age, sex, and disability, violated merit-system principles, and committed prohibited personnel practices. Specifically, the plaintiff, Michael R. Ward (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Ward”),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jordan v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Morgan v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Stovall v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Johnson v. Paragon Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.