Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Veneman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 24, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-319 RMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLYER, District Judge.

Michael W. Stovall, an African-American farmer residing in Alabama, sues the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”), an agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), and four individual FSA employees 1 for race discrimination. The Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, which Mr. Stovall opposes. The Court finds that his claims under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act are time-barred, his constitutional claims are precluded by the doctrine of sovereign immunity, and his contract claim must be presented to the Court of Federal Claims.

BACKGROUND

In…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Palmer v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. (PC) Valenzuela v. SantiestebanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Palmer v. Gmac Commercial MortgageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Stovall v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API