Pardue v. Pardue
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LANDRY, Judge.
These two actions, consolidated both on trial and appeal, consist of suit and counter suit between husband and wife for absolute divorce and separation a mensa et thoro, respectively. The suit of the husband, Hobart O. Pardue, Jr. (hereinafter referred to simply as “plaintiff”) prays for final divorce on the ground of alleged adultery while the counter action thereto by the wife, Katherine Ann Robinson Pardue (hereinafter referred to simply as “defendant”) asks for judgment in her favor decreeing a separation from bed and board between the parties on the ground of asserted cruel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eals v. SwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Armentor v. GondronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Houlton v. McGuirkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Abele v. BarkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Schaneville v. SchanevilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karl v. KarlLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- O'Neill v. O'NeillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gaudiano v. GaudianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974