Legal Opinion
M.K. Ex Rel. Mrs. K. v. Sergi
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 6, 2008No. 3:96CV00482 (WIG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PUTNAM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [# 227]
WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Mrs. K., on behalf of and as next friend of her son, M.K., (collectively “plaintiffs”), has brought this action alleging that defendants violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and her rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to United States Constitution,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colbert Ex Rel. Colbert v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- P. v. Greenwich Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- M.K. Ex Rel. Mrs. K. v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Horelick v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Terry-Ann Lawrence v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026