Legal Opinion

M.K. Ex Rel. Mrs. K. v. Sergi

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 9, 2008No. 3:96cv00482 (WIG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#232]

WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.

Mrs. K, on behalf of and as next friend of her son, M.K., (collectively “plaintiffs”), has brought this action alleging that defendants violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and her rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to United States Constitution,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.K. Ex Rel. K. v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API