In Re Brand-Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND REMAND ORDER
SELYA, Judge.
This matter is before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on the motion of various defendants 1 to vacate a conditional remand order (CRO), dated July 3, 2002, in which the Panel conditionally remanded the remaining Robinson-Patman Act claims in the seventeen actions listed in Appendix A to the district courts in which they were originally brought (and from which they previously had been transferred). For the reasons elucidated below, the Panel orders that the claims at issue, with a few exceptions (see infra n. 2), be remanded to the United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Roofing & Sheet Metal Services, Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Pickering v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Bailey v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-5District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Does 1 - 1,000District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.