Legal Opinion

Dunhill of Manchester, Inc. v. Bardelcik

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1973No. 6594PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a ruling of the Manchester District Court (Capistran, J.) denying his motion for a summary judgment on the grounds that RSA 491:8-a vests *277the power to grant summary judgments only in the superior court.

The background facts, as stated in plaintiff’s brief, disclosed that Dunhill’s, a New Hampshire employment agency, agreed to find a suitable place for Bardelcik for a fee of $260. Plaintiff’s records indicate that the defendant was placed with a Manchester law firm and that she was billed for the placement fee. When the defendant failed to respond to the bill and overdue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Niemiec v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  2. Community Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  3. New Hampshire York Co. v. Titus Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  4. Salitan v. TinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
  5. Chemical Insecticide Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General v. MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API