Dunhill of Manchester, Inc. v. Bardelcik
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a ruling of the Manchester District Court (Capistran, J.) denying his motion for a summary judgment on the grounds that RSA 491:8-a vests *277the power to grant summary judgments only in the superior court.
The background facts, as stated in plaintiff’s brief, disclosed that Dunhill’s, a New Hampshire employment agency, agreed to find a suitable place for Bardelcik for a fee of $260. Plaintiff’s records indicate that the defendant was placed with a Manchester law firm and that she was billed for the placement fee. When the defendant failed to respond to the bill and overdue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Niemiec v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Community Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- New Hampshire York Co. v. Titus Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Salitan v. TinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
- Chemical Insecticide Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attorney General v. MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989