Salitan v. Tinkham
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The entry of summary judgment by the Trial Court implied a finding that “no genuine issue of material fact exists.” RSA 491:8a (supp). See Nashua Trust Co. v. Sardonis, 101 N. H. 166, 170. The statute contemplates that such a finding may be made upon affidavit, and requires the moving party to file “affidavits based upon personal knowledge of admissible facts as to which it appears affirmatively that the affiants will be competent to testify.”
The substantive rights of the parties are controlled by provisions of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law appearing in RSA 337:62-59. Section 59…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Norwood Morris Plan Co. v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Iannelli v. Burger King Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Arsenault v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.