Legal Opinion
Humann v. KEM Electric Cooperative, Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 29, 2006No. 3:05-cv-00073PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are two summary judgment motions filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants, KEM Electric Coopera tive, Inc. (“KEM”), and Michael D. Rudolph, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on June 8, 2006, seeking summary judgment on all of the plaintiffs claims. On July 17, 2006, the defendant, Thomas B. Bair, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are granted.
I. BACKGROUND
On May 5, 2005, Ramona Humann commenced this lawsuit in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Diane M. Cossette v. Minnesota Power & Light, an Employer and Business Corporation in the State of Minnesota Joseph C. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Sandra Jarrett, - Appellee/ Cross v. Erc Properties, Inc., - Appellant/ CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Terry Graning, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Sherburne County Bruce Anderson, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nancy G. Holmes v. Trinity HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Humann v. KEM Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Dopita v. SM Fencing & Energy ServicesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.