Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 26, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

815 A.2d 964 (2003)

175 N.J. 456

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Ronald L. FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 8, 2002.

Decided February 26, 2003.

J. Michael Blake, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John A. Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).

Bennett A. Barlyn, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Attorney General of New Jersey (Peter C. Harvey, Acting Attorney…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. PreshaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. United States v. Reggie Neon BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. BlackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API