Legal Opinion

Beverly Hilton Hotel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2009No. B212205PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Beverly Hilton Hotel (Hotel) petitioned for writ of review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) concluding that respondent Samson Boganim (Boganim) was entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits under Labor Code 1 section 139.5. Effective January 1, 2009, however, Labor Code section 139.5 was repealed. (Stats. 2004, ch. 34, §§ 4, 5.) 2 We hold that because the Board’s decision was not a final determination of Boganim’s right to vocational rehabilitation benefits and because former section 139.5 has been repealed, he is not entitled to those…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District v. MannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Angelotti Chiropractic v. Christine BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Cnty. of San Diego Dep't of Child Support Servs. v. C.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. D.B. (In re D.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Kroger Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Barajas v. Satvia L.A. County Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API