Legal Opinion

Enzo Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co. of the Weizmann Institute of Science

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 6, 2006No. Civil Action 2:06cv377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOUMAR, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion by Defendant Jon W. Dudas, in his capacity as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Director”), to dismiss claims filed against him on July 3, 2006, by Plaintiff Enzo Therapeutics, Inc. (“Enzo”). The underlying lawsuit, filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, asserts four claims against the Director and Yeda Research and Development Company (“Teda”) that emerged from an interference proceeding (the “Interference”) conducted by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interference (the “Board”). Count I…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enzo Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Development Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API