Legal Opinion

Shane v. Rhines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1983No. 5653PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal arises out of an auto accident which occurred on the Kenai Spur Road in October 1978. At trial, Rhines, the defendant below, admitted that he had been drinking prior to the accident and that he was responsible for the collision. The jury awarded Shane, the plaintiff, $12,200 in compensatory damages, and judgment for that amount was entered in February 1980. The jury determined that Shane was not entitled to punitive damages. In this appeal Shane challenges: (1) the trial court’s exclusion of evidence of Rhines’ past conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol; (2)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Freeman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Bridges v. Alaska Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Wray v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Abruska v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API