Legal Opinion

Citadel Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1994No. A94A0643PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Citadel Corporation appeals the grant of partial summary judgment which ruled that Citadel released $531,294 in claims by signing modifications and pay application releases. Citadel also contends the trial court erred in compelling it to produce documents protected by the work product doctrine. This dispute arises out of construction contracts whereby Citadel built a manufacturing plant and administration building for the predecessor of Sun Chemical Corporation.

Fluor Daniel, Inc. (“Fluor”) and Citadel entered four modifications on the contracts. Each modification…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. R. S. Helms, Inc. v. GST Development Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Ambassador College v. GoetzkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. Computer Communications Specialists, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Akron Pest Control v. Radar Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Rice v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. General Motors Corp. v. ConkleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Citadel Corp. v. All-South Subcontractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Tyson v. McPhail Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API