Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Williams

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Circuit- Court, Randolph County. Action by D. E. Lutz against J. E. Williams and others. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:

The substantial parties to this action are the plaintiff, Lutz, and the Peoples National Bank of Elkins, a garnishee, claiming the fund in controversy. On the issue duly made between them, there was a verdict in favor of the garnishee, rendered under an instruction from the court, and judgment was entered accordingly. Having a judgment against J. E. Williams for the sum of $591.66 and believing the bank to be .indebted to him in the sum of about $1,500.00, for money deposited with it, the plaintiff proceeded against the bank by a suggestion based upon his execution. .The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Smith v. Sanborn State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Swann v. SummersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wait v. Homestead Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Batavian Bank v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City Nat. Bank of Huron, SD v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hudson United Bank v. House of Supreme, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Commercial Bank of Bluefield v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Credit Bureaus Adjustment Department v. Cox Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API