Legal Opinion

Haines v. Pacific Bancorporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

This is an action to enforce a contract alleged to have been entered into by defendant with other persons for the benefit of plaintiff. The defendant answered, denying the allegations of the complaint. At the beginning of the trial, the defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony upon the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. This objection was sustained and the action dismissed, and plaintiff has appealed.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff was the owner and holder of two hundred shares of the capital-stock of the Portland National Bank, and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Parker v. JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Feldman v. McGuireOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Pankey v. National Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. MacKubin v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API