Legal Opinion

Adams & Ford Co. v. Cullen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1910No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ogemaw; Sharpe, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Adams & Ford Company against Michael J. Cullen for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court by writ of certiorari. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff, a nonresident corporation, sued defendant in assumpsit in justice’s court. Defendant appeared specially upon the return day, and moved to dismiss the cause for the neglect of plaintiff to file security for costs. This motion was overruled, whereupon plaintiff’s counsel offered to become security. The defendant objected to this, upon the sole ground that the statute prohibited such action, and the justice so held. Thereupon, without a showing on oath, plaintiff moved an adjournment of the cause for the purpose of obtaining a surety, and this motion was granted against defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Segar v. Muskegon Shingle & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Warner v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ruberts v. HathawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Troy v. RodgersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Keister v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Chamberlain Medicine Co. v. Vander VeenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API