Legal Opinion

Segar v. Muskegon Shingle & Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtG-rant, J.

Suit was commenced by summons before a justice of the peace against Cyrus W. Utley. Summons was issued April 5, returnable April 15. On the return-day the officer returned the summons, certifying that he was unable to find the defendant within his county. An alias summons was thereupon issued, returnable April 19. The officer returned this summons, certifying that he was unable to find the defendant within the county.

Plaintiff thereupon made and filed with the justice an affidavit for attachment as a further continuance of his suit, under How. Stat. § 6828. The writ was issued, returnable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adams v. AbramMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams & Ford Co. v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brown v. KnopMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Henika v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Keister v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Adams v. OsborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API