Legal Opinion
Chamberlain Medicine Co. v. Vander Veen
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1911No. Docket No. 197Published
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Chamberlain Medicine Company against Jacob Vander Veen and Claude E. Vander Veen. Plaintiff obtained a judgment, from which defendants appealed specially to the circuit court. A judgment for defendants is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
This case was commenced in justice’s court by summons. The proceedings had on and after the return day are set out in the return of the justice as follows:
“ The cause was commenced by summons issued on the 11th day of April, A. D. 1910, returnable at my office in the city of Grand Haven, in said county, on the 19th day of April, 1910, aforesaid, at 8 o’clock in the forenoon, parties present in court by their respective attorneys. The plaintiff declared orally on the common counts in assumpsit, claiming damages in the sum of three hundred dollars, and filed order and bill as evidence under the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adams & Ford Co. v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910