Legal Opinion
Urdang v. Muse
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 30, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
114 N.J. Super. 372 (1971)
276 A.2d 397
EDWIN URDANG, ASSIGNEE OF MONARCH CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
PHILIP MUSE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, District Court, Essex County.
Decided March 30, 1971.
Mr. Joseph H. Cerame, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Philip Muse, defendant pro se.
YANOFF, P.J.D.C.
This case involves the enforceability of an acceleration provision in a retail installment contract in the light of Uniform Commercial Code provisions, N.J.S. 12A:1-203 and 12A:2-302, and the equitable powers declared applicable to County district courts in Vineland Shopping Center, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- John W. Skeels v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation v. Estelle A. Skeels, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associates Capital Services Corp. v. RiccardiDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- Integrity Insurance Co. v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- King v. South Jersey National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974