Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ridley v. First National Bank in Albuquerque

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1974No. 1221Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in ordering this suit to proceed as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(a)(3) of the Rules of Civil Procedure [§ 21-1-1(23) (a) (3), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 4)]. The overwhelming weight of authority supports the trial judge’s order.

There is no case law on the New Mexico class action statute or on the precise issues involved in § 50A-9-504, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 1, 1962) of the Uniform Commercial Code. It is necessary to analyze in some detail the way other jurisdictions have developed the law on the issues raised…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. American Federation of Musicians v. CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API