Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation Department Ex Rel. State

This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which reversed our prior decision, Coleman v. Oregon Parks and Recreation Dept., 221 Or App 484, 190 P3d 487 (2008) (Coleman I), and remanded for consideration of an issue that we did not reach in that decision, namely, whether the trial court erred by dismissing a claim for loss of consortium because of a failure to provide the required notice of that claim. Coleman v. Oregon Parks and Recreation Dept., 347 Or 94, 217 P3d 651 (2009) (Coleman II). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court as to that issue.

Plaintiffs…