Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. CC 05CV0272; CA A131472; SC S056563PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*96WALTERS, J.

A landowner is immune from suit for injuries that arise out of the recreational use of its land when the owner “permits any person to use the land for recreational purposes[.]” ORS 105.682(1). However, that immunity applies only if the landowner “makes no charge for permission to use the land[.]” ORS 105.688(2)(a). In this action for injuries arising out of plaintiffs’ use of a state park, the trial court granted summary judgment for the state, concluding that the state was entitled to recreational immunity under ORS 105.682. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Landis v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Fields v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Kelly v. HochbergOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Stedman v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API