(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Costello
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:23–cv–253-KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND 13 v. (ECF No. 2.) 14 MIA COSTELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jean Marc Van den Heuvel, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, 18 requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 19 Plaintiff’s affidavit makes the required showing, and so plaintiff’s request is granted. 20 However, the determination that a plaintiff may…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.