Charles Alfred Gaines v. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Plotkin, Sapir & Bradley, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The law firm of Plotkin, Sapir & Bradley, a partnership, appeals from the lower court’s dismissal of its petition to intervene in litigation between Charles Alfred Gains and Dixie Carriers, Inc. We think that the district court erred in not permitting intervention, and we therefore reverse.
On May 6, 1969, Charles Gaines appeared at the appellant’s law offices to discuss a Jones Act and maritime claim for injuries received about May 1, 1969. Mr. Gaines signed a contingent fee contract which provided that the appellant law firm was entitled to an interest in the present suit of one-third of all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Alex Peresipka v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, Michael A. Gerrard, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mountain Top Condominium Association v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- American Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Michael A. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Carlton v. Baww, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.