Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rose v. Myers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1986No. 85-405Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Hunt

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but cannot agree with its analysis of the constitutional challenge raised by appellants.

The majority reaches its decision without addressing appellant’s claim that Section 71-3-1203, MCA, is unconstitutional as violative of due process. Appellants first raised the issue in their initial complaint before the District Court. They gave notice to this Court of the constitutional challenge in compliance with Rule 38 M.R.App.Civ.P. Appellants have standing to challenge the statute. I cannot agree with the majority opinion that it is unnecessary to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Halldorson v. HalldorsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API