Legal Opinion

State v. Lowe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1991PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This appeal raises the question whether an accused has an absolute statutory right to a trial continuance if the state files an untimely notice of its intent to seek an enhanced sentence. We hold that an accused has such a right, and consequently, we vacate the defendant’s sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

On September 23, 1988, the Shelby County Grand Jury returned an indictment charging the defendant Lowe with the offense of robbery with a deadly weapon. A trial date was set for August 8, 1989. On August 2, 1989, six days prior to trial, the state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. HammerTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Blankenship v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MorganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. State v. HinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BlouvettTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. GravesTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API