Legal Opinion

State v. Blouvett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1995PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals found that the trial court had misconstrued certain statutory sentencing provisions 1 in establishing Corby Martin Blouvett II and Dennis James Ogle, defendants, as Range III career offenders and sentencing them as such. Specifically, the court held that the prior convictions used to enhance a defendant’s status beyond that of a standard offender must have been reduced to judgment before the commission of the offense which supports the enhancement. We granted the State’s appli cation for review under Rule 11, Tenn. R.App.P. in order to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AshbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lyons v. RasarTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilson v. Johnson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nichols v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DellingerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State of Tennessee v. Ledarren S. HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State of Tennessee v. Richard Odom, a/k/a Otis SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API