Legal Opinion

State v. Mead

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 21, 1982No. 64124PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

The principal problem in this appeal relates to the meaning of the word “confines” in our kidnapping statute, section 710.1, The Code 1979.

The jury could find the facts as follows. On April 15, 1979, Jovita Zamora (Jovita) and her mother, Angela Zamora (Mrs. Zamora), returned to Mrs. Zamora’s home after having Easter dinner with relatives. Jovita testified:

A. Yes, when I opened the door for my mother to go in, she didn’t go in, because someone was in that entrance. The minute that I opened the door, I thought my mother would step up, but she didn’t, then this young man…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Charles Raymond AlbrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State of Iowa v. Scott Robert RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. CeaserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. State v. FolckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API