Legal Opinion

Follett v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1943No. 29117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action on a promissory note executed by the deceased to the Citizen’s State Bank of Tekoa as payee. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

In 1931, the Citizen’s bank merged with another bank. It thereafter ceased to perform the ordinary functions of banking. It retained certain assets, however, among which was a note executed by deceased sometime prior to the merger. It continued to pay its annual license fees until 1936. Although it failed to pay license fees for 1936 and subsequent years, the secretary of state did not enter a notation of its dissolution upon the records…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Vanderpool v. VanderpoolMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dillabough v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. National Grocery Co. v. Kotzebue Fur & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MAPLE COURT SEATTLE CONDO. v. RooseveltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Maple Court Seattle Condominium Ass'n v. Roosevelt, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Inducon Corp. v. Crowley Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  4. Berg Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Hugill v. O'Harra Transp. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API