Legal Opinion
People v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1969No. Crim. 7066PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of the unlawful sale of narcotics. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11501.) He contends that he was denied due process of law because of an improperly suggestive identification procedure, and that the' trial court incorrectly determined that he was ineligible for commitment as a narcotic addict. These contentions are examined and found to be without merit. The judgment must "be affirmed.
Facts
In April and May of 1966, Edward Noriega, an agent with the Los Angeles office in the State Bureau of Narcotics…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Carter v. Carl T.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. McDanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.