Legal Opinion

State v. Jack

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2004No. 2003-CA-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jacob W. Jack appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a bench trial, for trafficking in marijuana. Jack contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that he claimed was obtained as the result of an unlawful search and seizure. He further contends that the trial court denied him the right to present oral argument at the close of trial.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. However, we conclude, based upon the this record, that the trial court did…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. City of Columbus v. WoodrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. GarrardOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Doucette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. Baron, 05 Ma 156 (8-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. McCausland, Ca2007-10-254 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API