Legal Opinion

Cont. Cas. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1929No. 4856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a review of an award of compensation in favor of Corwin R. Graves, a taxicab driver in the employ of the Yellow Cab Company. The facts are fairly stated in the findings of the Industrial Commission as follows:

"That on the 13th day of May, 1928, the applicant, Corwin R. Graves, pursued his duties as a taxi-cab driver for the said Yellow Cab Company and called at Rowland Hall early in the morning to pick up two passengers and haul them to the depot; upon his arrival at Rowland Hall he called for his passengers and carried two suit cases to the taxicab for his passengers, and while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Head Drilling Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bingham Mines Co. v. AllsopUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cook v. Charles Hoertz & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Gunnison Sugar Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Reiss v. Northway Motor & Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. Polar Ice & Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API