Legal Opinion
Mendocino Railway v. Jack Ainsworth
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2024No. 23-15857PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MENDOCINO RAILWAY, a No. 23-15857 California corporation, D.C. No. 4:22-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 04597-JST v. JACK AINSWORTH, in his official OPINION capacity as Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission; CITY OF FORT BRAGG, a California municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2024 San Francisco, California Filed August 29, 2024 Before: Sidney R. Thomas,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- American International Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc., a Philippines Corporation v. The Continental Insurance Company, a New Hampshire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Avi Nakash, Joe Nakash, and Ralph Nakash v. Georges Marciano, Maurice Marciano, Armand Marciano, Paul MarcianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Campbell v. Swedish Club Cultural CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Cherisha Lovejoy, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Transdev Services, Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Feneck v. SBHU Life Agency IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Lofall v. Clackamas CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Ozcan Tankoba v. Café Figaro, Inc, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.