Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Seward

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 21, 1923Published

1DissentCraves, J.

(dissenting). — I am constrained to dissent in this case. I concur, however, in all of the opinion except paragraph four and the result reached. My dissent must, as a matter of course, center upon the .questions ruled in this paragraph of the opinion. Of these matters in order.

I. In the modified opinion now before me, in speaking of the majority opinion in State ex rel. v. Drabelle, 261 Mo. 515, it is said: “The intent is not to re-open that controversy, though the briefs discuss it, nor to decide again that question, but to show that whatever view is taken of it the result must be the same.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Pacific Railroad v. GovernorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Ex parte WrenMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API